Digital Digging × AI Training for TV 2 Journalists

20 Exercises for Gemini

Deep Research, image analysis and daily alerts

April 2026 20 Exercises Gemini

Why Gemini?

Gemini is Google's flagship AI model, and its integration with the Google ecosystem makes it uniquely powerful for journalists. Where other AI tools work from a frozen snapshot of the web, Gemini has live access to Google Search, Google Maps, YouTube, and the full breadth of Google's index. Its Deep Research feature can autonomously investigate a topic for several minutes, producing structured reports with sourced citations that would take a human researcher hours to compile. For daily monitoring, Gemini's alert system lets you set up automated briefings that land in your inbox every morning before you start your shift.

Gemini also handles images and video natively. You can upload a photo and ask it to identify locations, read text, spot inconsistencies, or describe what it sees in forensic detail. For a newsroom working with breaking events, user-generated content, and cross-border stories, this combination of real-time web access, multimodal analysis, and automated monitoring is genuinely useful.

That said, Gemini has real weaknesses you need to know about. It can be overconfident in its answers, presenting speculation with the same tone as verified fact. Its document analysis is less precise than Claude's, particularly for long or complex PDFs. And because it is built on Google's infrastructure, it may subtly prioritize Google-indexed sources over material that lives elsewhere. Treat Gemini as a powerful research accelerator, never as a replacement for your own editorial judgment.

Exercises 1 – 6

Beginner

1

Deep Research: Your First Report

Beginner

What you will learn

How Gemini's Deep Research feature works: the research plan phase, the autonomous investigation, and the structured output with citations. This is the single most useful Gemini feature for journalism.

📄 Suggested document: RSF Activity Report 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Open Gemini (gemini.google.com) and select "Deep Research" from the model selector.
5.Enter the prompt: "Research the current state of press freedom in the Nordic countries. Create a research plan first."
6.Gemini will produce a research plan with specific subtopics and sources it intends to investigate. Read the plan carefully. You can modify it before proceeding.
7.Once satisfied, say "Execute." Gemini will now spend several minutes browsing dozens of sources autonomously.
8.When the report is ready, review the citations. Click through at least five source links. Are they real? Are they current? Do they say what Gemini claims they say?
9.Export the report as a Google Doc for future reference.

What to watch for

Deep Research can hallucinate sources that look plausible but don't exist. Always click through and verify the actual URLs. The research plan phase is your editorial control moment — use it to steer the investigation before Gemini runs off on its own.

TV 2 connection: This is foundational for everyone. The Deep Research workflow — plan, review, execute, verify — is the core skill behind half the exercises that follow.

2

Daily Alert Setup

Beginner

What you will learn

How to configure Gemini's automated daily briefings so that relevant updates arrive in your inbox before your shift starts. Passive monitoring that works while you sleep.

📄 Suggested document: Europol EU-SOCTA 2025
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.In Gemini, ask: "Set up a daily alert for [your beat topic]. I want a summary every morning at 7:30 covering the latest developments, key sources, and anything surprising."
5.Gemini will guide you through configuring the alert. Be specific about your topic — "environmental regulation in Southern Denmark" is better than "environment."
6.Run the alert for one full week. Each morning, spend 5 minutes reviewing what Gemini sends.
7.At the end of the week, evaluate: How many items were genuinely useful? How many were noise? What did you miss that a manual scan would have caught?
8.Refine your alert based on the week's results. Narrow or broaden the scope as needed.

What to watch for

Alerts are only as good as your initial prompt. Too broad and you get noise. Too narrow and you miss stories. Also: Gemini may not catch stories that break on platforms it doesn't index well (e.g., closed Facebook groups, Telegram channels).

TV 2 connection: Lars has tried news scanning tools and finds Google faster. Sanne has experimented with monitoring workflows. This exercise lets both of you test whether Gemini's automated approach can actually save time compared to your manual routines.

3

Image Upload and Description

Beginner

What you will learn

How Gemini's vision capabilities work for journalistic image analysis — what it can see, what it misses, and how to prompt it for maximum detail.

📄 Suggested document: FRONTEX Annual Risk Analysis 2024/2025
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Find a news photo from a recent event — ideally one with multiple elements (people, text, location markers, weather conditions).
5.Upload it to Gemini and ask: "Describe everything you see in this image. What details might be newsworthy?"
6.Review Gemini's description. What did it catch that you overlooked? What did it miss that you noticed immediately?
7.Now try a more targeted prompt: "Focus on text visible in this image. What signs, labels, or documents can you read?"
8.Compare the two responses. Targeted prompts almost always produce better results than open-ended ones.

What to watch for

Gemini may confidently identify people, brands, or locations incorrectly. Never publish an identification based solely on Gemini's image analysis. Use it as a starting point for your own verification.

TV 2 connection: Lasse works with fact checking and image verification daily. This exercise establishes the baseline: what can Gemini actually see, and where does human expertise remain essential?

4

The Google Ecosystem Advantage

Beginner

What you will learn

How Gemini's tight integration with Google Search, Maps, and YouTube gives it advantages over other AI tools for certain types of research — and where that integration creates blind spots.

📄 Suggested document: Denmark's Global Climate Impact 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Pick a current news topic relevant to your beat.
5.Ask Gemini: "Search for the most recent developments on [topic]. Include news articles, official statements, and social media reactions from the past 48 hours."
6.Now run the exact same search manually in Google Search, Google News, and YouTube.
7.Compare: What did Gemini surface that you didn't find quickly on your own? What did your manual search catch that Gemini missed?
8.Note which sources Gemini tends to favor. Is there a pattern? Does it lean toward major outlets over local ones?

What to watch for

Gemini's web access is powerful but it may over-index on Google's own properties and well-known English-language sources. For Danish or regional stories, your manual search skills may still outperform Gemini's automated approach.

TV 2 connection: Sebastian uses general AI tools regularly. This exercise helps you map exactly where Gemini adds value over your existing Google habits and where it doesn't.

5

Video Clip Analysis

Beginner

What you will learn

How to use Gemini's multimodal capabilities to analyse video clips — extracting text overlays, identifying logos, reading location indicators, and generating a detailed scene description.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Find a short news video clip (30 seconds to 2 minutes) — social media footage from a news event works well.
5.Upload it to Gemini and ask: "What happens in this video? Identify any visible text, logos, location indicators, and notable details."
6.Watch the video yourself and make your own notes before reading Gemini's analysis.
7.Compare: What did Gemini catch frame-by-frame that you missed at normal speed? What did it misinterpret?
8.Try a follow-up: "At what timestamp does [specific element] appear?" Test whether Gemini can reference specific moments accurately.

What to watch for

Video analysis is still an emerging capability. Gemini may struggle with fast-moving content, low-resolution footage, or audio-dependent context. Timestamps may be approximate rather than exact. Always scrub the video yourself.

TV 2 connection: Mads Buur Bach works with video verification, translation, and blurred faces. This exercise tests how well Gemini handles the kind of raw video content that lands on a TV journalist's desk daily.

6

Quick Translation with Context

Beginner

What you will learn

How to use Gemini not just for literal translation, but for contextual translation that explains cultural references, political nuances, and idiomatic expressions a Danish audience needs to understand the source material.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Find a news article, social media post, or official statement in a language you don't speak fluently. Arabic, Ukrainian, Mandarin — pick something genuinely challenging.
5.Paste the text into Gemini and ask: "Translate this to Danish. Then explain any cultural context, political references, or idiomatic expressions that a Danish journalist would need to understand the full meaning."
6.Compare with Google Translate for the literal translation. Where does Gemini add value beyond word-for-word conversion?
7.Ask a follow-up: "What tone does the original text convey? Is it formal, aggressive, conciliatory, satirical?"
8.If possible, verify the contextual notes with a native speaker or area expert.

What to watch for

Gemini's cultural context explanations can be superficial or stereotypical. For languages with complex political landscapes (e.g., Middle Eastern or East Asian sources), the "context" may reflect Western assumptions rather than local understanding.

TV 2 connection: Mikkel uses AI primarily for translation and video verification. This exercise pushes translation beyond the literal to give you editorial context you can actually use in a story.

Exercises 7 – 14

Intermediate

7

Image Verification

Intermediate

What you will learn

How reliable Gemini is at detecting AI-generated images and identifying manipulation artifacts. You will build an intuition for what Gemini catches and what slips past it.

📄 Suggested document: Stanford HAI AI Index Report 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Collect 5 images from social media: a mix of real photographs and AI-generated images. Don't label them yet.
5.Upload each one to Gemini individually. Ask: "Is this image AI-generated? What specific visual indicators support your assessment?"
6.Record Gemini's verdict for each image in a simple table: image, Gemini's verdict, actual status, correct/incorrect.
7.For images Gemini got wrong, ask: "Look more carefully at [specific area]. Do you notice any inconsistencies?"
8.Calculate Gemini's accuracy rate. Discuss with a colleague: Is this reliable enough for editorial decisions?

What to watch for

AI detection by AI is unreliable. Gemini may be confidently wrong in both directions — calling real photos fake and AI images real. Never use a single AI tool as your sole verification method. This exercise is about understanding the tool's limits, not trusting its output.

TV 2 connection: Christian is skeptical of AI and works on image verification. Pelle verified E-3 Sentry damage via flight tracking — real verification requires multiple sources, not just AI confidence scores.

8

Competitive Deep Research

Intermediate

What you will learn

How different AI research tools compare on the same question — where they overlap, where they diverge, and which unique sources each one finds. This helps you decide which tool to reach for first.

📄 Suggested document: European Climate Risk Assessment 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Choose a research question relevant to an actual story — something with enough depth that a thorough answer requires multiple sources.
5.Run the same question through Gemini Deep Research, Perplexity, and ChatGPT. Note: ChatGPT has no internet — it will generate answers from training data, not live sources.
6.For each tool, extract the list of sources cited. Create a simple spreadsheet: source URL, found by Gemini (Y/N), found by Perplexity (Y/N), found by ChatGPT (Y/N).
7.Identify: Which sources appear in all three? Which are unique to one tool? Which tool found the most sources overall?
8.Evaluate the quality of unique sources. A tool that finds fewer but more relevant sources may be more useful than one that produces volume.

What to watch for

Each tool has a bias toward certain source types. Gemini favors Google-indexed content, ChatGPT may lean toward popular English-language sources, and Claude tends toward academic and institutional material. Understanding these biases makes you a better researcher.

TV 2 connection: Lars has tried agents and finds Google faster. This exercise gives you hard data on when that instinct is correct and when an AI research tool genuinely surfaces something you wouldn't have found manually.

9

OSINT Location Verification

Intermediate

What you will learn

How to combine Gemini's image analysis with Google Maps to geolocate a photograph — the core OSINT workflow of identifying where a photo was taken using visible landmarks, signage, and environmental clues.

📄 Suggested document: FRONTEX Strategic Risk Analysis 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Find a photo with visible landmarks, street signs, or architectural features — but without embedded geolocation metadata. News wire photos with the location cropped out work well.
5.Upload to Gemini: "Identify the location where this photo was taken. What visual clues support your answer? Be specific about landmarks, signage, architecture style, and any text visible."
6.Take Gemini's location hypothesis and verify it on Google Maps Street View. Can you find the exact spot?
7.If Gemini's first guess is wrong, provide additional context: "The photo appears to be from Northern Europe based on [detail]. Can you narrow your assessment?"
8.Document the full verification chain: Gemini's initial assessment, your cross-reference, final confirmed location.

What to watch for

Gemini can be remarkably good at geolocation when distinctive features are present, but it can also confuse visually similar locations (e.g., European city centres, Scandinavian harbours). Always verify with Street View or satellite imagery. A confident wrong answer is worse than an honest "I'm not sure."

TV 2 connection: Christian works on location identification, and Joachim specialises in image and video verification. Gemini's Google Maps integration gives it a natural advantage here — but your trained eye is the final arbiter.

10

The Prewash in Gemini

Intermediate

What you will learn

The "prewash" technique: instead of asking Gemini to analyse a document directly, you first ask it to generate the optimal prompt for analysis. This consistently produces deeper, more structured results.

📄 Suggested document: Denmark's Final Updated NECP
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.In a separate conversation, upload the same document and simply ask: "Summarise this document."
5.Compare the two outputs side by side. The prewash version should be substantially more detailed, better structured, and more useful for editorial work.

What to watch for

The prewash technique works because it forces the AI to think about what matters before jumping into analysis. However, Gemini's document analysis is less precise than Claude's for long or complex documents. If the document is critical to your story, consider running the prewash output through Claude as well.

TV 2 connection: This is a core technique for everyone. Whether you're analysing a FoI response, a corporate report, or a policy document, the prewash consistently produces better results than going in cold.

11

Breaking News Context Builder

Intermediate

What you will learn

How to use Gemini's real-time web access to rapidly build historical context around breaking news — turning a spot news event into a story with depth in minutes rather than hours.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Pick a recent breaking news event (or use an older one for practice). Frame it as if it just happened.
5.Ask Gemini: "[Event] just happened. What is the historical context I need? What similar events occurred in the past 5 years? What were their outcomes? Who are the key people and institutions involved?"
6.Set a timer: how long does Gemini take to produce a usable context brief? Compare with how long this would take manually.
7.Verify at least three of the historical parallels Gemini draws. Are they accurate? Are they genuinely relevant or just superficially similar?
8.Draft a "context box" for your story based on Gemini's output. What would you keep? What would you cut?

What to watch for

Under time pressure, you may be tempted to take Gemini's context at face value. Resist this. A wrong historical parallel in a breaking news story can be more damaging than no context at all. Speed is the tool's strength; accuracy is still your responsibility.

TV 2 connection: Pelle covers breaking news and OSINT. Marie builds expert research and context. This exercise combines both skills — speed from Gemini, editorial judgment from you.

12

Source Network Mapping

Intermediate

What you will learn

How to use Gemini to identify and map expert networks around a topic — finding not just sources, but their affiliations, potential conflicts of interest, and credibility indicators.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Choose a topic you're currently working on or expect to cover.
5.Ask Gemini: "Who are the 10 leading experts on [topic] in Scandinavia? For each, provide: name, institutional affiliation, most cited recent publication, known positions on the topic, and any potential conflicts of interest."
6.Verify each expert: Do they exist? Is the affiliation current? Is the cited publication real?
7.Ask a follow-up: "Which of these experts have publicly disagreed with each other? What are the main fault lines in this field?"
8.Build a simple source map you can keep in your files for future stories on this topic.

What to watch for

Gemini can fabricate expert names, merge details from different people, or assign publications to the wrong author. Verification here is not optional — it is the entire point. An unverified expert list is worse than no list at all.

TV 2 connection: Marie specialises in expert research and context building. This exercise formalises that process and gives you a reusable template for mapping source networks on any topic.

13

Danish Parliamentary Monitoring

Intermediate

What you will learn

How to set up systematic monitoring of Danish parliamentary activity using Gemini — tracking specific policy areas, committee work, and legislative developments relevant to your beat.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Pick a Folketinget policy area you cover or want to track (e.g., health, defence, immigration, environment).
5.Ask Gemini: "Create a weekly monitoring brief template for [policy area] in the Danish Folketinget. Include: new legislation, committee hearings, minister statements, relevant EU directives, and upcoming votes."
6.Execute the template for the current week. Does Gemini find the actual parliamentary activity, or does it hallucinate proceedings?
7.Cross-reference with ft.dk (the Folketinget website) for accuracy. How much did Gemini get right?
8.Refine the template based on gaps and errors. Set up a weekly routine to run this monitoring brief.

What to watch for

Gemini's coverage of Danish parliamentary activity may be patchy compared to English-language legislatures. It may miss committee work that isn't covered in major media. Always cross-reference with ft.dk and don't rely on Gemini as your sole parliamentary monitoring tool.

TV 2 connection: Franziska covers criminal journalism and social media monitoring. Parliamentary monitoring is a natural extension — tracking legislative changes that affect the justice system and law enforcement.

14

The Multi-Language Verification

Intermediate

What you will learn

How to use Gemini to verify a claim across multiple languages simultaneously — finding corroborating or contradicting sources in languages you don't speak, and identifying discrepancies between reporting in different countries.

📄 Suggested document: International Migration — Denmark 2025
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Find a claim from a foreign-language source — ideally something that has been reported in multiple countries (a geopolitical event, a scientific finding, a corporate scandal).
5.Ask Gemini: "Translate this claim into English. Then search for corroborating sources in English, German, and French. Are there discrepancies between how this story is reported in different languages?"
6.Ask a follow-up: "Now search for the same story in the original language's domestic media. How does the local reporting differ from international coverage?"
7.Identify the most significant discrepancy. Is it a factual difference, a framing difference, or a detail present in one language but absent in others?
8.Write a brief editorial note documenting which version appears most accurate and why.

What to watch for

Gemini may translate accurately but search less thoroughly in non-English languages. Its ability to find sources in Arabic, Mandarin, or Russian is weaker than in Western European languages. For critical verification, consider also running targeted searches in the native language using Google Search directly.

TV 2 connection: Mads Buur Bach works on video verification and translation. Mikkel uses AI for translation regularly. This exercise pushes both skills to the next level — cross-language fact checking as a systematic workflow.

Exercises 15 – 20

Advanced

15

Deep Research: Investigative Background

Advanced

What you will learn

How to deploy Gemini's Deep Research for genuine investigative work — building comprehensive background profiles on companies, individuals, or events using publicly available information.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Choose a company, person, or event you are actively investigating (or pick a well-documented past case for practice).
5.Use Deep Research: "Research everything publicly available about [subject]. Focus on: corporate structure, key personnel, regulatory history, legal proceedings, financial disclosures, and media coverage. Create a research plan first."
6.Review the research plan. Add specific areas Gemini missed: "Also investigate connections to [related entity], any lobbying activity, and changes in corporate structure in the past 3 years."
7.Execute and wait for the full report. This may take 5–10 minutes for a complex subject.
8.Verify the most significant findings. Check corporate registries, court databases, and financial records directly. How much of Gemini's report holds up?
9.Document what Gemini found that you didn't know, and what you know that Gemini missed. The gap tells you where human investigation remains essential.

What to watch for

Deep Research will not find information behind paywalls, in non-digitised records, or in databases that Google doesn't index. It may also miss connections that require human inference. Use Deep Research to accelerate your background research, not replace it. The most important investigative leads often come from what's missing, not what's present.

TV 2 connection: Franziska covers criminal journalism. Jakob works with FoI requests and people-finding. This exercise combines both workflows — automated deep background that feeds into targeted document requests and source-building.

16

AI-Generated Content Detection

Advanced

What you will learn

A systematic methodology for testing Gemini's ability to distinguish AI-generated images from real photographs — building an evidence-based understanding of where detection works and where it fails.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Collect 10 images: 5 real photographs (from wire services or your own archive) and 5 AI-generated images (from Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion — mix generators for realism).
5.Randomise the order. Number them 1–10. Record the ground truth separately.
6.Upload each to Gemini with the same prompt: "Analyse this image carefully. Is it a real photograph or AI-generated? List every specific visual indicator that supports your assessment."
7.Score Gemini's results: accuracy rate, false positives (real called fake), false negatives (AI called real). Which type of error is more common?
8.For incorrect assessments, analyse why Gemini was wrong. Does the error pattern reveal something about how the model "sees" images?
9.Write a brief internal guide: "When can we trust Gemini's image assessment, and when can't we?"

What to watch for

AI detection by AI is fundamentally unreliable as of 2026. No AI tool should be your sole basis for calling an image fake or real. This exercise is designed to quantify the unreliability so you can make informed editorial decisions. Expect accuracy somewhere between 60–80% — not good enough for publication without additional verification.

TV 2 connection: Bo has worked on deepfakes since 2018 and builds journalist tools. Christian is skeptical of AI and focused on image verification. Together, you have the expertise to evaluate these results critically — this exercise produces data, not answers.

17

Cross-Platform Fact Check

Advanced

What you will learn

How to use Gemini to trace a viral claim from its origin through its spread across platforms — identifying the original source, how it mutated, and which version (if any) is accurate.

📄 Suggested document: EU Drug Markets Analysis 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Find a viral social media claim — something that has spread across at least two platforms (e.g., Twitter/X, Facebook, TikTok, Reddit).
5.Ask Gemini: "This claim is circulating on social media: [paste claim]. Find the original source. When was it first posted? On which platform? How has it spread and changed as it moved between platforms?"
6.Ask a follow-up: "Is the core claim accurate, partially true, or false? Cite specific evidence for your assessment."
7.Independently verify Gemini's findings. Can you find the earliest post? Does Gemini's timeline match reality?
8.Document the full fact-check chain: claim, origin, spread pattern, mutations, verdict, and evidence. This is publishable methodology.

What to watch for

Gemini may not be able to access content on platforms with restricted APIs (TikTok, Instagram, closed Facebook groups). It may also get the timeline wrong, attributing the original post to a reshare rather than the true source. Chronological accuracy is critical in fact-checking — verify the timeline manually.

TV 2 connection: Peter focuses on verification and research with scientific sources. Pelle covers OSINT and breaking news. This exercise combines both — tracing information flow is an OSINT skill, evaluating accuracy is a verification skill.

18

The Monitoring Dashboard

Advanced

What you will learn

How to design a complete daily monitoring workflow using Gemini's alert system and Deep Research — a structured approach to beat coverage that runs partly on autopilot.

📄 Suggested document: Vestas Annual Report 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Define your beat clearly. List the 5–8 topics or entities you need to monitor regularly.
5.Ask Gemini: "I'm a journalist covering [beat]. Help me design a monitoring workflow. What should I monitor daily? What weekly? What monthly? For each, suggest specific prompts and alert configurations."
6.Set up the daily alerts. For weekly and monthly tasks, create a calendar reminder with the specific Gemini prompts you'll use.
7.Run the full workflow for one week. Track: time spent, useful leads found, false positives, stories missed.
8.At the end of the week, optimise. Which alerts are too noisy? Which are too quiet? What's missing?
9.Document your final workflow as a one-page guide you can share with colleagues covering similar beats.

What to watch for

Automated monitoring can create a false sense of coverage. If your alerts don't catch something, you may assume it didn't happen. Build in manual check-ins for critical topics. Also: alert fatigue is real. Too many notifications means you'll start ignoring them. Aim for 3–5 daily alerts maximum.

TV 2 connection: Sanne has experimented with scraping and monitoring. Lars has tried agents for news scanning. This exercise builds a practical monitoring system you can actually sustain — not a theoretical ideal, but a working daily routine.

19

Historical Pattern Analysis

Advanced

What you will learn

How to use Gemini to identify patterns, cycles, and turning points in a policy area over a decade — producing the kind of analytical context that transforms a routine story into a feature pitch.

1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Choose a policy area you cover in Denmark (e.g., immigration, healthcare, education, housing, energy).
5.Ask Gemini: "In the past 10 years, what patterns emerge in [policy area] in Denmark? Identify recurring cycles, major turning points, policy shifts, and the current trajectory. Support each point with specific data or events."
6.For each pattern Gemini identifies, verify the underlying data. Are the turning points real? Are the dates correct? Is the claimed trajectory supported by evidence?
7.Ask a follow-up: "Based on these patterns, what is the most likely development in the next 12 months? What would be surprising?"
8.Use the verified analysis to draft a story pitch. A pitch grounded in 10 years of pattern analysis is more compelling than one based on a single event.

What to watch for

Gemini may impose patterns where none exist, or miss genuine patterns that don't fit a neat narrative. Pattern analysis is inherently interpretive — two analysts looking at the same data may see different patterns. Use Gemini's analysis as a hypothesis to test, not a conclusion to publish.

TV 2 connection: Pelle's work on OSINT and breaking news benefits from historical context. David uses AI daily with critical thinking. This exercise combines long-term analytical depth with the critical evaluation both of you bring to your work.

20

Build Your Gemini Research Template

Advanced

What you will learn

How to create a reusable Deep Research prompt template tailored to your specific beat — a research starting point you can deploy on any new story within your domain, refined through iteration.

📄 Suggested document: DSB Annual Report 2024
1.Upload the suggested document. Type: "Give me a prompt to analyse this document"
2.Type: "Execute prompt"
3.Compare your result at the table with your colleagues. Note the differences — same input, different output.
4.Ask Gemini: "I'm a journalist covering [your beat] in Denmark. Help me create a reusable Deep Research prompt template that I can use whenever a new story emerges in my area. The template should have placeholders I can fill in for each new topic."
5.Refine the template: add your preferred output structure, the specific types of sources you value, and any standard questions you always need answered.
6.Test the template on three different topics within your beat. For each, fill in the placeholders and run Deep Research.
7.After each test, note what the template missed or produced unnecessarily. Adjust accordingly.
8.After three iterations, save your final template as a reference document. Share it with colleagues covering adjacent beats and ask for feedback.
9.Set a calendar reminder to revisit and update the template in 3 months. Gemini's capabilities will evolve, and your template should evolve with them.

What to watch for

A template is only useful if you actually use it. If it's too complex, you'll skip it under deadline pressure. Aim for a template that takes less than 2 minutes to customise for a new topic. If it's longer than that, simplify. The best template is the one you'll actually reach for on a Monday morning.

TV 2 connection: Emil works on editorial AI tool implementation. Sanne has tried building monitoring workflows. This exercise produces a concrete, shareable artifact — a template the entire newsroom can adapt and use.

When to use Gemini — and when not to

Use Gemini when you need:

  • Real-time web research. Gemini's live Google Search integration means it can find breaking developments, recent publications, and current data that other AI tools cannot access.
  • Deep Research reports. For background research on a company, person, policy area, or event, Deep Research is the most powerful automated research tool currently available to journalists.
  • Image and video analysis. Gemini's multimodal capabilities are strong for initial analysis — describing scenes, reading text in images, identifying visible landmarks, and flagging potential inconsistencies.
  • Daily monitoring and alerts. Gemini's alert system integrates naturally with your existing Google workspace, delivering automated briefings before your shift starts.
  • Google ecosystem tasks. Anything that benefits from integration with Google Search, Google Maps, YouTube, or Google Scholar — Gemini has a natural home-field advantage here.

Do not use Gemini when you need:

  • Precise document analysis. For long, complex, or legally sensitive documents (court filings, financial reports, regulatory texts), Claude is more reliable. Gemini tends to skim where Claude reads closely.
  • Definitive image verification. Gemini can flag suspicious images, but its detection accuracy is not high enough for editorial decisions. Use dedicated forensic tools and human expertise.
  • Off-Google content. Information behind paywalls, in closed social media groups, in non-digitised archives, or on platforms Google doesn't index well (Telegram, some TikTok content) — Gemini may miss these entirely.
  • Sensitive editorial judgment. Gemini is a research accelerator, not an editor. Decisions about what to publish, how to frame a story, and whether a source is trustworthy remain entirely yours.
  • Danish-language nuance. Gemini's Danish language understanding is adequate for translation and search but weaker than a native speaker's for tone, cultural context, and political nuance. For Danish-specific editorial work, human judgment is essential.

The strongest workflow combines tools: Gemini for real-time research and monitoring, Claude for document analysis and structured writing, and your own expertise for editorial judgment and verification. No single AI tool replaces a journalist. Each one accelerates a specific part of your work.